Control and Other Necessary Fictions – Guest Author Steve Hauptman
The following is a guest post about control by my good friend, Steve Hauptman. I’ve followed Steve’s work for some time, now, because of the way he writes about/sheds light on the issue of control, which is such a big issue for those who struggle with secondhand drinking | secondhand drugging and those who struggle to wrest control of their drinking or drug use.
Steve Hauptman, LCSW, is a Gestalt-flavored psychotherapist in private practice on Long Island and the creator of the blogs Monkeytraps, Monkey House and Bert’s Therapy. He is also the author of a new book, Monkeytraps: Why everybody tries to control everything and how we can stop, currently being serialized at monkeytraps.com. To learn more about Steve’s upcoming book, click here.
Control and Other Necessary Fictions by Steve Hauptman
A necessary fiction is a story we tell ourselves to help us get through life.
It’s not a lie, exactly. Nor is it entirely the truth.
It’s more like an aspiration — a way of reaching towards what we need or want.
It makes us feel good about ourselves, or life, or the future. It makes pain and disappointment more bearable. Gives us courage. Gives us hope. Helps us cope.
We all live by necessary fictions. We all tell ourselves stories about who we are and what we’re doing and where it will all lead.
For example,
Everything will be okay.
We’ll live happily ever after.
I’ll never die.
The people I love will never die.
I’ll never get old and sick.
Money buys happiness.
Driving is safe.
If I vote for X, it will make a difference.
Tomorrow’s another day.
I can get control of how I feel.
That last one is my favorite, of course, since the idea of control is the necessary fiction my blog Monkeytraps is all about.
Why do I call these fictions necessary?
Because of our big brains.
Like oversized computers run amuck, our big brains are dominated by the process Buddhists call monkeymind — an incessant stream of remembering and projecting, interpreting and analyzing, worrying and agonizing.
Ever stop to listen? It’s a nuthouse in there.
Necessary fictions act as a sedative. They appease monkeymind, quiet it down.
Imagine, for a moment, living without that sedative.
Imagine living day to day, hour to hour if you cannot forget that someday you must die. I’ll never die fends off death anxiety.
Imagine getting in your car and running to the store for milk if you can’t forget that someone dies in a car accident every 13 minutes. Driving is safe is the necessary antidote.
But:
There’s a difference between relying on necessary fictions and being lived by them.
We must remember that our fictions are fictions. To do that means being self-aware and self-supporting.
To forget that they’re fictions — that this is a story we tell ourselves, not a literal truth — is to lose touch with reality.
Religious bigots are a good example. They’re convinced themselves the story they believe is The Truth. It’s a short step from that conviction to seeing everyone who doesn’t share it as deluded, even evil. (Even deserving extinction. Read the papers.)
Control addicts are another example. They’ve convinced themselves — despite all evidence to the contrary — that control is both possible and necessary. So they spend their lives chasing it, like a hapless commuter ten steps behind a train he can never catch.
Which leads to lives of frustration and misery. Control addicts make other people pretty miserable too.
In therapy I try to help them see control as a necessary fiction, a story they tell themselves about the way they want things to be. It’s a very human story. One that’s sometimes necessary, and sometimes necessary to give up.
Because if you can’t give it up, you’ve made a problem out of a solution.
Steve invites your thoughts and comments and can be reached via email at fritzfreud@aol.com.
This is so relevant for me. Just becoming aware of my narrative has allowed me to make some positive changes. I’m using the “perfect reverse barometer” method which is whatever my initial reaction to a situation is I do the opposite. Only half joking :-))
Dennis, your “perfect reverse barometer” sounds like what I call the Costanza Method, after the “Seinfeld” character who transforms himself from loser to winner by ignoring his natural inclinations.
I actually suggest it to clients — and wrote a Monkeytraps post about it (at http://wp.me/pUxjX-2Sa) — because I think there’s real value in intentionally thinking outside our own boxes and moving beyond our comfort zones.
So good for you. 🙂
Well said! I like Steve’s distinction between conscious reliance on some of our fictions to [calm ourselves down] and the pathology of needing, therefore believing in them. I like the generosity of the distinction. Thanks
Thanks, Alexis. 🙂
Hi Steve,
Great to see you here and congratulations on your book! I like your description of control as a story we tell ourselves about the way we want things to be. Knowing when to hold on to control and when to let go, especially in situations where someone else’s behavior feels destructive can be challenging, so I do appreciate your insights. Thank you!
Thanks, Cathy. 🙂
Thanks, Cathy. Yes, that’s when the urge to control gets overwhelming, like the urge to swat a mosquito on your nose. Sometimes the best we can do is not swat it so hard that we knock ourselves out. 😉